Passer au contenu
 Appel ou SRV : 1 (888) 867-0053
Sortie rapide

Bibliothèque

Legal Capacity International

This library includes resources from the Legal Capacity International platform, which aims to advance Article 12 UN CRPD, and to have functional supported decision – making models around the globe. The library fulfills the knowledge sharing objective so that system shakers and supported decision-making activists can share local projects, research projects, mentoring, capacity-building, and any other resources to help and support others.

Collections de cette bibliothèque

Capacité juridique en Europe

Bibliothèque

Cette collection fournit des ressources sur la capacité juridique des personnes en situation de handicap en Europe.

Resources in this library

Filtres

Type de ressource

Sujet

Phase de la consultation

Secteur

Domaine d’impact

Langue

Ukraine’s Legal Capacity Regime: Failing People with Disabilities

Lignes directrices et meilleures pratiques par Nouvelle Société Institut ((Anciennement Institut IRIS)

Langues: Anglais

Fight for Right Ukraine, in partnership with the New Society Institute, has released a comprehensive study examining Ukraine’s legal capacity regime and its impact on people with intellectual, psychosocial, cognitive, and other disabilities. Legal capacity—the legal recognition of a person’s right to make decisions and exercise rights—is a cornerstone of human rights and is protected under Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), which Ukraine ratified in 2010. Despite this commitment, tens of thousands of adults in Ukraine remain under guardianship or subject to court-ordered restrictions that strip them of decision-making authority, often for decades. These arrangements, frequently described as “civil death,” leave individuals unable to make basic choices about their lives, with limited opportunities for review or restoration.

Using the Legal Capacity Inclusion Lens, the study analyzes how civil law, judicial practice, and institutional systems interact to restrict legal capacity in practice. It finds that Ukraine’s regime is still rooted in outdated, disability-based models that prioritize guardianship and substituted decision-making over supported decision-making, which is largely absent from law and practice. The research also identifies serious data gaps that obscure the true scale and duration of legal capacity deprivation. Importantly, the study situates reform within Ukraine’s broader goals of deinstitutionalization, social inclusion, and European integration, emphasizing that full recognition of legal capacity is essential to these efforts. Drawing on comparative international experience, it offers a roadmap for transitioning toward a system grounded in equality, autonomy, and support—framing legal capacity reform as a necessary step toward a modern, rights-based, and inclusive Ukraine.